Appreciate Differences and Similarities in Texts Essay

Appreciate Differences and Similarities in Texts - Essay ExampleThese articles directly targets underlying ratifiers. Level of education of readers and their class These types of readers mostly belong from upper senior, high school level where their main task is to do straightforward analysis. Get the relationships mingled with the documents, do a critical analysis and suffice general conclusions from this. Students in this level of education get mainly interested in entertaining articles that they roll in the hay easily put into practice their reading and understanding analytical skills. The two articles in question ar admirable examples that high school level students whitethorn be materially interested in as they go along with their basic reading abilities that vary from independent, instructional and frustration. Writing techniques used by the authors In the two given articles, just like other written materials, they contain a wide variety of writing techniques that swear out to appeal t the readers and help convey the intended message with a clear understanding. There is many writing technique s that writers involve in their works of writing. These writing techniques collect to have a deliberate impact to the readers. ... The frontmost article is ironical. It is not logical for humans to complain on the violation of animals rights when involved i8n testing of naked medicines, while the medicine that is being tested is for ensuring human survival. In the same article, it is rather ironical that humans complain on animals pang in medical tests, while humans do them in order to ensure that the animals too also can survive as animals medicine do exist too. .yet it is not only humans who benefit from medical science. Researching on animals has also led to many advances in veterinary medicine practices. Dogs can instantly be protected against distemper.cats can now be immunized against enteritis and cat flu. The writer portrays verbal irony in this article as the writer contradicts the human party stand. Different impressions created by the two texts The writers in the two articles give an array of mixed fillings. The writer in the first article gives the reader no clear perspective on his article. In addition to giving mixed emotions, they are also widespread all over the article. In the first paragraph, he talks about humans and death and makes no substantial deal out of it. He makes it look like a normal affair and gives it some improvement that life expectancy has improved from the past times. However at a point in the article, he talks tells how humans make use of animals for their own benefits. He questions it to be either a matter of animals right or human ill. At this point, the writer creates an impression that humans are being unfair to animals. The writer portrays this, as an act of selfishness by humans. Before this the writer says,